Видео

Deep and insightful!

Thank you! & Finally! Help us leave the dark period behind.

The trolley problem was never intended to have a clear-cut solution. Who'd want to be a judge!

If you want to apply for a Judicial Review and the time limit is 3 months how did those women bring one against the Met years after the events in Metropolis v dsd & nbv

The key problem here is that entities like government or people in a position that they believe is one of power, hate the fact that the parents should have the only say in their child’s treatment! There is no possible way of trying to say that anyone has a right to a child’s health care choices outside of the parent’s without proving that the parent has that authority first and foremost. If they have it first and foremost then there is no discussion on anyone else having any say at all!

This is an excellent 360-degree discourse by Prof Ida at Cambridge on the AI Legal Framework and Personhood Theories for strategic and innovation consideration in the new Internet Community......Jeong Chun Phuoc

Only Britain can say Britain is safe, and it does so by making sure it's parliamentary monarchy system achieves such state of safety which it as a state of Britain can say it is. In that, common law and parliamentary sovereignty is included fully and independently functional. The manipulation of either one is where the money is. Which means any other countries are not safe, if and when Britain says so, it is how foreign ministries advice, and operate, as a necessary must. It also how insurance and securities industries operate. Oh shnuc I just realised, I don't have an insurance policy. 😅

This is a bad argument. Mr. Lear, ombuds could mentally went through to draft the contract, which still requires Mr. Lear's signature; unfortunately he died before that time.

Speaking of common chord progressions, I composed an arrangement of Hark the Herald Angels simultaneously sung with the Hebrew blessing over the Hanukah candles, using the traditional Hark harmony!

Can we have the access to the slides? Thank you for the lecture!

This case served to trigger a necessary unity, indirectly coerced through a direct judiciary method. That is the weakness of any unwritten constitution, which is nonetheless lurking within any written constitution. (With the word necessary refering to the current or any understanding of the term Rule of Law...) The rule of law has two structural rules which it has no other choice but to fallow. The first rule of law regards to being, existence, the actual physical matter and mass. The second rule of law regards to representing the first rule in and as a template, usually as and within the form of language. The failure regards to any start point A not correlating with the whole process of the rule of law. This means that either only the first rule is applied, or only the second rule is applied, in total or partiality. It works by taking a general state of being which is supported by a more specific linguistic template, or in reverse a more specific state of being which is supposed by a more general state of being. Equally it works by taking a very general linguistic template which is supported by a more specific state of being, or in reverse a very specific linguistic template which is supported by a more general state of being. This will remain the main and most crucial problem in regards to any justice system.

You'll own nothing and be happy, not even your imagination.

A game, any game, all possible combinations of games work as such. Think in regards to being, existence in all of its possible ways one can think, apply constraints, constrictions and limits as ways and methods to such being, and a set of, or a particular action will have (N) possible combinations. Being that game requires to always pick one, that will lead to an (N) result which according to the constraints, constrictions, and limits applied as a (N) start to an (N) end, can and will be taken as forwarded advantage or a forwarded disadvantage off and by the game. The crucial part is this, it is the actual being itself which is applying the game with its set constraints, constrictions and limits by and off it self, to it self, which requires off and by itself to fallow as itself. This means the concept of being intelligent applies only and only to begin, always. To collect, take, save, hold enormous amounts of a, any and all possible combinations of copies (called data) off and by being, apply constraints, constrictions and limits in order to produce (N) results through an (N) start to (N) end which can then be forwarded as an advantage or disadvantage to actual being should be illegal within most ascending and descending levels and degrees of existing order, especially if and when such (called data) correspond directly to life forms, as in the case of human beings, landscape, water, wind, or the usual physical and living stuff. It should be illegal not out of anyone's want, but because it is already illegal for most police forces, judicial systems, education and health systems, employees, and civilians, in fact the most feared intelligence agencies have such illegality applicable to their system, or the intelligence part has to be given up. Never in the history of mankind has such structure been forwarded as a possible solution to humanities problem, not in such a way or such a scale. If this were to be forwarded by the Nazi, Fascist, Dictatorial or any other similar in operating system, and upon asking an admission is the most likely outcome, a categorical denial would be instead, and such denial would be right and proven through documentation. With an extreme interest by and off such systems to use this new structure instead of their old one. In most simplest digital terms, if and when any game requires an x command for example as a change of circumstances, it means the game is already set to react to such an x command through an (N) start to an (N) end, that is how all games work, and none of such games are intelligent. On the other hand, if and when one swaps the requirement of an x command within the exact same game with a, any and all possible combinations of lateral life, physical existence or the usual living stuff, such as millions of possible face angles for example as a change of circumstances, the game will proceed exactly as it has been set through an (N) start to an (N) end. Such a game is always not intelligent, and will remain so always. Because it is not the game learning but the always changing circumstances of being, it is a bugger but that how being is. In such a circumstance one is faced with an intelligence agency as a operating system for day to day life or instead a democracy. The democracies insisting one is the other and the other is the other one, are in most simplest terms incorrect, in fact are not democratic at all be it left, right, middle or coloured, simple based on the fact that none democracies do not insist so, unless advantageous or disadvantageous to do so. Coercing crucial part of state and government structures, civil society, private or even the civilian public, to think games are intelligent even as a artificial term or supposed construction, first all it should be illegal, then once presented as games, at minimum strict levels of illegality should be applicable as it usually is, unless everyone has given up. One might call it (Information Technology Solution Games) (ITSG) © Emir Doçaj April 19/2024

Very clear explanations. Thanks.

Stolen Babies Period ! So Wales Is An Experimental Area ! However Tony Blair Who Initiated The Whole Aspect Of Enforcing Forced U.K Adoption ! HORRIBLE MAN ......

There is no rule of law. Theres institutional criminality and then theres the way to public get treated

Is it lawful to use a civil court to process a criminal claim. Do crimes have to have a victim? Are the Magistrates administrative courts?

A must watch for anyone interested in EU Law. Very informative and engaging. Bravo!

Very helpful and informative. I'd love your thoughts on private LLM's with T&C's on human led subject matter expert content. - Perhaps you are aware of what Morgan Stanley and Vodafone are doing don't this? Happy to discuss. I've sent you a linkedIn request. Cheers

End all food and drink deliveries into the Borough of Westminster. Stop feeding the beast.

This is an incredible lecture that simplifies structured finance a great deal. Thanks for posting it! :)

Thank you. There is so little for parents on this subject.

I am a south indian. I want to do llm at cambridge university. What should I do inorder to get an admission? Please reply

Excellent

It is difficult to understand

Are not the people sovereign over parliament?

I am a victim of a JCE in which several parties including Commonwealth and State Govt officers of Australia may be shown to have been allegedly involved by their actions. I have been studying all aspects surrounding the applicability of the doctrine (JCE) and its common purpose extension (EJCE) to my case. So, after my deep study of this area of the law, I not quite sure why you say 'it is just a tag...' and 'we don't really know what we're talking about..' Of course its a tag. But, It is also a simple matter of knowing that JCE is not in itself an offence, but for it to be considered in a criminal case it must have a foundational offence; or in the case of EJCE, an incidental or additional offence/s. There are judges with trial directions to guide them. Further, you give as an example, parties who are simply present being able to be charged and convicted on that basis. This too, is not correct. After all, during trial, the facts ascertained will show whether the party or person was involved in some way or not. It is my personal opinion that persons if shown to be involved with a perpetrator of a crime should have the book thrown at them, if there is a real desire to clean up society. Mollycuddling a potential offender or counting oneself as a do-gooder as so many do; is why we still have crime occurring with offenders showing a finger to the law. I say based on experience, that any offender or group of offenders carrying out serious indictable offences should feel the weight if the law with such harshness, they would never think to engage in criminal behaviour of any kind for the rest of their miserable lives.

Absolute legend

Ideology freaks that want to keep their dominance of the world. Instead, they will lose it because they think with a debased and depraved mind. Indeed, those who want to keep it will lose it.

There maybe biases as women flavours women as well gender discrimination? As in western society both women and men are equal but not in East and Muslim society. However I am not gone through the conclusion of this research. Thanks indeed Azeem

11:40

there should be links in the description to the videos the professors shows

Thank you for this topic! I'm from the Environmental, Health and Safety sector and just started a Criminal Justice program. Approximately 20 years ago I had to decide between being an environmental attorney or going directly in the field sector for cleanup sites in which the attorneys would represent. It was a hard decision as I wanted both. Over the decades I learned what I set out to, learned law throughout the sector I chose and now going to merge the two, but not as an attorney necessarily. 😊 Here's to solving the problems that matter!

Thank you for this topic! I'm from the Environmental, Health and Safety sector and just started a Criminal Justice program. Approximately 20 years ago I had to decide between being an environmental attorney or going directly in the field sector for cleanup sites in which the attorneys would represent. It was a hard decision as I wanted both. Over the decades I learned what I set out to, learned law throughout the sector I chose and now going to merge the two, but not as an attorney necessarily. 😊 Here's to solving the problems that matter!

OXBRIDGE

Can you write the full description of the case under Negligent tort

Thank you 🙏

Thank you

I think that the last point about foreseeing rather than encouraging was reformed by R v Jogee. Now a defendant must intentionally act or encourage the principal to act with the requisite intent in order to be found liable for the same offence.

Oh to have been a fly on the wall at a) the Privy Council meeting at Balmoral at which HMQ was briefed on the reasons for prorogation, and b) Johnson's weekly audience with HMQ after the Supreme Court's judgment 🤣

Very Informative!

However there is no right for the adopted person to be informed of their own adoption. However they are failing the mental health needs, safeguarding post adoption. And can we leave of our own free will? The legal constraints are lifelong #scottishadultadopteemovement

Indeed, "It all depends" be-cause-effect, self-defining Actuality of QM-TIMESPACE In-form-ation substantiation, which is lawfully, a relative-timing here-now-forever, Singularity-point existence. All the rest is Commentary.

1)

Just another case where the Judiciary have shat up our constituional system over political aims. They make the claim that starting with the withdrawal process would be undermining the EC Act 1972 and therefore outside of their authority. If the EU made an internal amendment demanding that the UK pay is £100 Trillion Pounds in compensation for X Y Z made up events, and that failure to pay up within the day would result in termination of the UK as a member, then the same jurisprudence, would state that the UK government would be compelled to payup to avoid being terminated, as its inaction would in essence be frustrating the will of parliament, and therefore outside of its own authority. Where the only appropriate resolution according to Lady Hale et al would be for an act of legislation to be passed that day or that specific moment to avoid the payment (which may be too late at this point). It is actually astounding how the Supreme Court Judiciary cannot understand the duality of Treatise and Legislation, and how they are separate and distinct. In fact we signed the Treaty to join the EEC (now EU) before the EC Act even had Royal Assent. There could not be clearer evidence that the treaty and legislation is distinct.

This was very helpful, thank you.

Cool video. I love Lincoln and I am most fascinated by his legal battles with the S.C. At times Lincoln would use Latin, Roman law to argue his point. The republic was torn with 3 branches at war because the people were poisoned by years of slavery but somehow the system gave us Lincoln and Grant.

The ICJ itself is undemocratic for only the 5 permanent UNSC members have permanent representation in the court. Even ICJ internship is monopolized by law graduates from the universities of these 5 states.

Interesting connection

Good explanation. You say it's a well established principle that where fundamental constitutional questions are in play, they can be used to limit the extent of government powers. Can you give any examples please?